Skip to yearly menu bar Skip to main content


Poster

Flow-field inference from neural data using deep recurrent networks

Timothy Doyeon Kim · Thomas Luo · Tankut Can · Kamesh Krishnamurthy · Jonathan Pillow · Carlos Brody

West Exhibition Hall B2-B3 #W-312
[ ] [ ]
Wed 16 Jul 11 a.m. PDT — 1:30 p.m. PDT

Abstract:

Neural computations underlying processes such as decision-making, working memory, and motor control are thought to emerge from neural population dynamics. But estimating these dynamics remains a significant challenge. Here we introduce Flow-field Inference from Neural Data using deep Recurrent networks (FINDR), an unsupervised deep learning method for inferring low-dimensional, nonlinear, stochastic dynamics underlying neural population activity. Using spike train data from frontal brain regions of rats performing an auditory decision-making task, we demonstrate that FINDR performs competitively with existing methods in capturing the heterogeneous responses of individual neurons. When trained to disentangle task-relevant and irrelevant activity, FINDR uncovers interpretable low-dimensional dynamics. These dynamics can be visualized as flow fields and attractors, enabling direct tests of attractor-based theories of neural computation. We suggest FINDR as a powerful method for revealing the low-dimensional task-relevant dynamics of neural populations and their associated computations.

Lay Summary:

Neurons work together in large groups to solve tasks---like deciding whether to buy a laptop or not based on online reviews. A central premise in neuroscience is that the brain's algorithm for doing such tasks can be succinctly represented as a differential equation describing how this group activity changes over time. In this work, we present a method called FINDR that aims to discover what this differential equation is, using real brain activity data from animals doing specific tasks. The method does this in two main steps:1) It separates the brain activity that is relevant to the task from activity that isn't.2) Then it learns the most likely differential equation that is consistent with the task-relevant brain activity.We show that this approach performs competitively with existing methods in predicting neural activity, while being better at discovering differential equations that neuroscientists can interpret.

Chat is not available.